Circular No. 182/16/96-CX dated 8/3/96
Subject:- CE-Classification of Portland Slag Cement & Portland Pozzolana
Cement during the period 1.3.92 to 28.2.94 - Clarification
I am directed to say that doubts have been expressed regarding correct
classification of Portland Slag Cement and Portland Pozzolana Cement as to whether
under sub-heading 2502.29 or 2502.90 during the period 1.3.92 to 28.2.94. The doubts
have arisen in view of the changes effected in Chapter 25 of the Central Excise Tariff
Act, 1985 in the Budget of 1992-93.
2. The issue was discussed in the South Zone Commissioners" Conference held in
Coimbatore on 27th and 28th December, 1993 and it was decided to obtain the views of
TRU, as to whether it was the intention of Government to extend the concessional rate
of duty to slag based cement which is available to portland cement falling under sub-
heading No. 2502.29 in terms of Notification No. 7/92-CE dated 1.3.1992 as amended by
Notification No. 56/92-CE dated 31.3.1992 and Notification No. 5/93-CE dated
28.2.1993. The matter was further discussed in the West Zone Commissioners" Conference
held in Aurangabad on 14th & 15th July, 1994, where a view was taken that the products
in question may appropriately be classifiable under sub-heading No. 2502.90 attracting
higher rate of duty than ordinary Portland Cement during the material period. It was
never the less felt that the Government had no intention to charge higher duty on
Portland Slag cement and Portland Pozzolana Cement than ordinary Portland Cement.
Therefore, with a view to invoking the provisions of Section II-C of CESA, 1944 the
Board vide letter of even number dated 23.9.94 had floated a survey among the Central
Excise field formations to ascertain the general practice of assessment in this regard
and directed the CCEs not to enforce the demands raised on this account till further
orders. The Survey showed that there were divergent views regarding the classification
though a majority of the Commissioners were of the view that the correct was sub-
heading 2502.29.
3. The Board while considering the proposal to invoke Section II-C observed that the
issue of classification of the goods in question has to be decided before the proposal
could be considered. Therefore the classification issue was examined further in
consultation with TRU, DG(AE), DG(1) and all the Chief Commissioners of Central Excise.
The view that emerged was that the goods in question merit classification under sub-
heading No. 2502.29 during the material period.
4. The matter has since been carefully examined by the Board. The Board has taken note
of the fact that prior to the Finance Bill 1992 Portland Slag Cement was classified
under Heading 2502.20 which covered Grey Portland Cement which included Ordinary
Portland cement, Portland Pozzolana Cement, Portland Slag cement etc. with effect from
1.3.92, the Tariff structure relating to heading 25.20 was amended and a generic entry
in the name of Portland Cement was introduced without expressly mentioning that this
included Portland Cement, portland Pozzolana Cement and Portland Slag Cement etc. as
was the case prior to 1.3.92. It appears that the generic name Portland Cement
included all the categories of cement which were mentioned in heading 2502.20 before
1.3.92. It has two sub classifications i.e. white cement under sub-heading 2502.21 and
all other types of Portland Cement under sub-heading 2502.29. All varieties of
Portland Cement including Pozzolana and Slag Cement other than white cement should
fall under 2502.29. The Tariff changes effected w.e.f. 1.3.94 have also covered these
categories of Cement under 2502.29. On the other hand Heading 2502.90 covers other
types of cements not mentioned in the Heading 2502.21 to 2502.50 i.e. cements other
than Portland Cement, Aluminous Cement, High alumina refractory cement etc.
5. The effective rate of duty for cement under sub-heading No. 2502.29 in terms of
Notification No. 7/92-CE dated 1.3.1992, as amended, is Rs. 330/-per tonne and under
sub-heading 2502.90 the tariff rate is 40%. It would be highly inequitable to charge
40% to Portland slag cement and Portland Pozzolana Cement because the price of the two
cements is more or less the same as Portland cement. The intention of the Government
was also never to charge a higher rate of duty for Portland Slag Cement and Portland
Pozzolana Cement. Therefore these would continue to be classified under the category
of portland cement and attract the same rate of Excise duty applicable to Ordinary
Portland Cement prior to and after the tariff amendment of 1992. The Tariff amendments
were carried out to avoid disputes regarding classification of white cement so as to
make the classification of white cement more explicit.
6. Thus it is apparent that treating portland slag cement and Portland Pozzolana
Cement as a different class of cement from portland cement is not correct particularly
when the tariff does not specifically mention it to be different from the portland
cement. The classification of portland slag cement and Portland Pozzolana cement
therefore should be correctly done as others, under subheading 2502.29 during the
period March, 92 to February, 94.
7. In view of the above it is clarified that portland cement (including ordinary
portland cement, portland pozzolana cement and portland slag cement) would merit
classification under Sub-heading 2502.29 during the period 1.3.92 to 28.2.94.
8. Trade and Field formations may be advised accordingly.
9. All pending disputes/assessments may be finalised in view of the above guidelines.
Sd/-
(Rajiv Bhatia)
Under Secretary to the Govt. of India.
F.No. 115/7/93-CX.3
Presented by eximkey.com